Performance Indicators
|
Outstanding
|
Viewpoint:Thesis/Claim
|
- Has sharply defined, compelling organizing idea, thesis or question.
- Clear introduction presents thesis in a highly engaging, compelling manner.
- Coherent, complex, sophisticated argument supports organizing idea/thesis.
|
Evidence and Sources
|
|
Analysis and Persuasion
|
- Argument draws on, explains, and critiques evidence from alternative points of view.
- Clearly, thoughtfully, and thoroughly explains and analyzes the connection between all evidence and argument being made.
|
Effective Organization
|
- Each argument clearly flows in support of an overall structure.
- Consistent, effective transitions develop ideas and arguments logically& build to a compelling, persuasive conclusion.
- Distinct conclusion synthesizes arguments that support idea/general thesis.
|
Understanding of
Implications and Context
|
- Arguments, ideas, and voice reflect a highly informed awareness of the large historical, political, or cultural context surrounding questions addressed in the paper.
- Broader implications of the central arguments are presented and thoroughly explored.
|
Strong, Engaged Student
Voice
|
- Confident, highly fluid writing style; lively, engaging, articulate language. Paper ha distinct, individual voice that serves to develop and further the argument throughout.
*
|
Conventions (for writing
task only)
|
- Grammar and punctuation nearly flawless.
- Appropriate and consistent documentation of accessible sources (complete, well organized bibliography and citations).
|
|
- Communicates clear understanding of the paper’s ideas and arguments in an appropriate, consistently sophisticated way that demonstrates ownership of work.
- Presentation and response to questions reflect the coherence and depth of the paper.
- Answers questions accurately, thoughtfully, and effectively, developing new idea when they are appropriate. Presents relevant evidence that may not have appeared in the paper.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment